[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.15139260 [View]
File: 76 KB, 1280x1280, Omega-exp-omega-labeled.svg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15139260

Just to be clear: we are all in agreement that even if (You) have
>muh "definition of computability"
we can still *informally compute* with your noncomputability proofs that specific real numbers are noncomputable, using diagonalization arguments, transfinite recursion, AC, &c.
in other words, they're only "noncomputable" from the point of view of your primitive CS brains bound to weak and feeble finite bodies, while us mathchads send thunderbolts down like Zeus

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]