/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15432049
>Merit and ability officially counts for nothing in science
True.

>i call it getting ripped to shreds when you post the truth and the people don't believe it

>>12149654
Good luck with that. You ought to write it in shit language and say it only hold in under the assumption of three strung tenuous propositions
>Hamiltonian for the zeros of the Riemann zeta function
>https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.03679

>>12133816
>whole thing became a sissy politically-correct playground
>values feelings over anything else
>governed by a few elites
>your career and life easily replaceable as another dime-a-dozen STEMslave
>no different in value to a wagecuck
This person clearly has IRL professional STEM experience.

RH is false, as all of you fucking pieces of shit know fully well, and most of the rest of you do too.

Zeros of the Riemann Zeta Function Within the Critical Strip and Off the Critical Line
https://vixra.org/abs/1912.0030

>>11010410
If I am held responsible for what others do or do not do, then I hold you responsible for blacklisting me from publishing anywhere, and for likely sending "DO NOT PUBLISH" national security letters to every journal to which I submit a manuscript.

Did you know that arXiv rejected my paper with the excuse "no scholarly content?" That is not a realistic simulation of mainstream academia. That is a realistic simulation my enemies' malice fetish and their stirring shit into the pot of everything I do, always. I think it is completely unrealistic to think that mainstream academia would look at my paper and say "no scholarly content." They might say, "This is wrong," but is normal to publish wrong, yet interesting results because the wrongness might be fixed while preserving everything that is interesting.

Case in point, pic related. Lebesgue had to specify that doubling up on false propositions is of no interest because it is very much that case that the implications of single false propositions are always of interest (when they are interesting), because a single false proposition might be tweaked to make it stop being false. If the first author couldn't fix it, maybe a reader of the journal that publishes the implication of the false proposition might fix it, and then he could write a paper about it. This is how "mainstream academia" usually does science. That is why journals exist: to spread new ideas. Two false propositions is too much because it means everything is totally fucked up, but the reason Lebesgue wrote that is because if a novel implication can be extracted from single false proposition, then that novel implication is absolutely of interest and should appear in the literature.

Arxiv's excuse, "No scholarly content," sounds like the USA saying, "Let's not just blacklist him, let's try to piss him off too."

No scholarly content my fucking ass!

Not all of them are on arXiv

I mean, how does pic related happen if I'm not in a fucking bubble?

arXiv rejected my paper
Real Numbers in the Neighborhood of Infinity
http://www.vixra.org/abs/1811.0222
citing a lack of scholarly content. Fuck off with that bullshit. There's dozens of proofs of RH on arXiv right nwo, all of them wrong as fuck.

>>10456883
I produced this second, better negation of RH

Real Numbers in the Neighborhood of Infinity
http://www.vixra.org/abs/1811.0222

as a corollary of an intensive 8-12 study program once I got access to regular internet facilities in a private place over the summer (after one year of homelessness and now I have spent the majority of 2019 locked in a small box, probably getting secret anal surgery on my implants.) I am about to stop being homeless, hopefully. I finally calculated the exact number where zeta is equal to zero, but it was very easy because two years ago I already proved that zeta is zero somewhere in the neighborhood of infinity.

I disproved RH originally in this other paper

On The Riemann Zeta Function
http://www.vixra.org/abs/1703.0073

two years ago. Nota bene!!! Since Perelman only published on arXiv, before Perelman could turn down the $1M, Clay had to issue him a waiver in the rules for getting the money because his paper was never peer reviewed. That is the EXACT same waiver I need for my publication on viXra dated two years ago

VERSION 1
http://www.vixra.org/pdf/1703.0073v1.pdf

this month. I am black-listed by arXiv, am I also blacklisted by Clay?

>>10295903
>yeah
>>10295901
>strangely high level of resistance

>>10270601
Nothing went wrong with the proof. The problem with the human culture. Corollary from here:
Real Numbers in the Neighborhood of Infinity
http://www.vixra.org/abs/1811.0222

>>10252241
>>10252241
Helene is the schizo poster because she is the who lied in the affidavit which led to my enslavement. The doctor there told me that I wasn't schizophrenic, and then during the hearing to end my enslavement she told the judge that I was as a surprise to elicit an outburst from in the hearing which the judge would have used to grant the petition. I did not have an outburst, neither when she had told that I was not a mental health danger to myself or others and then did tell judge that I was, neither when she said there is no way that the reason I seemed irritated in my meetings with her might have been due to Helene and Joe raping with their mental health fraud affidavit wherein they alleged that I had threatened to attack the personal residence in Buckhead of the Governor. I had said no such, only when Helene started with her, "Oh yeah, what then tough guy?," did I mention that I might escalate my Occupy Activities to include a breaking a public facing window downtown. When Helene and Joe signed the affidavit, they lied and said I was going to the Governor's home instead of the Capitol building wherein lies the window entertained in rhetorical response to Helene's retarded, "Oh yeah, what then tough guy?," line of rhetoric regarding the status of my research.

>>10223846
>http://vixra.org/pdf/1809.0557v1.pdf
This is actually my second disproof, the first one is here:
On The Riemann Zeta Function
http://www.vixra.org/abs/1703.0073

>>10223846
The million isn't for solving the problem, Clay doesn't have any reward money available for people who solve the problem. The money is only for people who can post a solution on a website they like but I cannot. I published the above 21 months ago and would be getting the $1M this spring if they had started the clock when I published, but since Clay doesn't allow viXra and no other site allows me, these last two years of my homelessness are likely to continue (barring some surprising turn of good fortune.)

>>10212744
>money is for solving the problem
money is **~~NOT~~** for solving the problem

>>10120622
>you see them as the good guys right now?
where do you come up with this stuff?
>will you hate them too
Not if they give a reasonable rejection rationale, pic related, cough cough

>>10103119
This is my favorite one