/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16009089
Without a source it's hard to critique. I have heard that, for example, Europeans and sub-saharans are about as genetically divergent as are two population of chimps in Africa that are separated by a river. The measurement by which one says this is Fst. Do note however that this river means those two populations have been separated for hundreds of thousands of years. Also note by that same measurement of Fst, Human continental populations are as or more diverse as a plethora of species that have several recognized subspecies. A commonly brought up example is actually one which are recognized as different species altogether, i.e. the Wolf and Coyote.

>>15568771

>>15293599
You appeal to authority and ridiculously presume my position irrational, only due to its political and social stigma. Yet as a Biologist myself who has worked in the CSIRO and the Sydney Blood Bank, I started off with the same revile you demonstrate of so called 'racists'. Then I turned eleven and began taking a whole hearted interest in our field. You should know then how taboo it is to speak of these racial differences within our profession, not because they are wrong or improper - we have to incorporate so called 'racist ideals' - in order to do any broad spectrum research or study and then pretend our results were "surprising" "happenstance" etc.

You listed apparent outdated ideals and sciences that were NOT disproven but rather abandoned for political expediency. Eugenics is literally in practice right now in Iceland and it has improved their population immeasurably for its reduction in physical and mentally disabled persons. All you have to do is turn off the government tap and force parents to care for them on their own dime and allow termination of the pregnancy when a deficiency is detected - 99% of the people will opt (and have in Iceland) to eliminate poorly developed unborn children instead. It is a mercy.

Genetics is much farther along the so called descent into irrational racism than any KKK retard could hope for compared to Phrenology. You can find tens of thousands of initiatives, programs, charitable ventures that have tried to eliminate the 'gap' between the White race and the rest and not one has EVER succeeded. Ever. The evidence is overwhelming in one direction and only hopes and dreams as well as self delusions allow the continued existence of the other.

As a scientist myself all I can find is mountains of tests that failed to produce even a modicum of results the current prevailing theory stipulates MUST be true. I did not want this to be so. Only in Hollywood is this true.

>>14761730

three

>>14514017
Race can affect IVF outcome
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/08/160818212907.htm
"the study found that White Irish, South Asian Indian, South Asian Bangladeshi, South Asian Pakistani, Black African, and Other Asian women had a significantly lower odds of a live birth than White British women."
Less successful for Asians
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ivf-successful-s-idUSTRE61M54T20100223
presumably due to higher testosterone (dat manjaw and bad WHR)
Lower odds of non-white live birth
https://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(15)00359-3/fulltext

White/Black babies are less healthy than White babies.
Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2867623/
>Mixed race couples are more likely to have stillborn babies than same-race couples.
Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15994621
>Black-White children are more likely than both Black and Whites to make poor decisions.
Source: http://www.nber.org/papers/w14192
>Mixed race kids suffer from low self-esteem, social isolation, and poor family dynamics.
Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/
>Mixed race children are more likely to have health problems, high stress, smoke, and drink.
Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/
>interracial people cannot receive organ donations.
Source: http://content.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1993074,00.html