/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12529761
>Russian Vaccine

No thanks, putin is a retarded tyran, even more dangerous for Mankind that was trump

>>10734740
You ever get the feeling you're talking to an ape throwing shit on a keyboard? No? Of course you don't because you're an ape throwing shit on a keyboard.
Read >>10734742.

>>10503314
>we are single cell organisms because that's what we started as

How about you understand you were just lucky, and try to help them be a better person? Understand that you have a better intellect, and instead of talking at light speed, quickly mentioning random useless tangents, using large words, and failing to properly explain how you got from one point to another you be considerate and elevate public wisdom?

>>10303369
>the universe is finite

>>10282354
>evolution is junk science

>>10253016
Language is a social construct. Everything you just said is a social construct. I guess I can now safely ignore it because it is a social construct and I can thus interpret it in any way I like and I choose to interpret it as being baseless conjecture.

>>10126370
>>10127080
Brainlet tier understanding. Just because they have no choice doesn't mean nothing affects the outcome you fucking retard. Every action or thought still requires a catalyst. Just like how your parents failure led to you being an absolute spastic on a Mongolian throat singing forum. Just because the destination is decided doesn't mean the journey is unnecessary.

>trusting iq to measure intelligence in general

Is it actually worth it to take a full course on CS? I feel like it's a subject that, compared to pure math and other sciences, has many more online resources which cater towards self learners.

>>9985132
Thing have shape put air down. Air stuff so thing that put air down go up. Spin does same to human place do, so put thing that goes other spin. I make Hewicopter :DDDDDD

>>9979806
>>9979807

Will, Noun.
"the faculty by which a person decides on and initiates action."

ITT: Determined Brainlets from birth.

Is it possible to be good at research math but not competition math?

>>9915207

Fuck. I meant to reply to >>9915173

>>9895892

Yes, there are languages where double negatives don't exist, but if you think about it logically, it's non intuitive.

example : opposite of the opposite of cold

cold = cold

opposite of cold = hot

opposite of the opposite of cold = opposite of hot = cold

get it?

>>9893260

Can you explain your passion to me? what's so cool about rocks?

>>9875441

Never taken an IQ test, and yes it's probobly not 80, but I don't think it's very high. Anyways I don't want this to become another IQ thread on /sci/

>then why did you mention IQ

More proof that it's farther on the left of the bell curve

80 IQ brainlet here, sorry for asking this question because I'm sure someone already asked it. In the end what is the CTMU attempting to prove? Through skimming of Wikipedia articles it seems like he's trying to formally define reality by relying on the fact that it's defined by how our mind processes it.

COME AND GET THE FRESHEST PSEUDO SCIENCE, PERFECT FOR STROKING YOUR EGO

Nah, no astrology today sir, but we DO have some MBTI, caught just this morning along the eastern shore

take the test if you haven't already: https://www.16personalities.com/free-personality-test

Fuck. IQ is real, and it's unchangeable, im sad. I'm forever a brainlet

80 IQ brainlet here. Can someone spoon feed me our current understanding of gravity? I'm a little confused when it comes to visualizing how it behaves. When reading Wikipedia or similar sources, it seems like gravity is a thing every piece of mass possesses, it extends infinitely and has a uniform field of affect. But then I see pop sci articles explaining "the speed of gravity", and how it's wave of influence travels at the speed of light. I even have a friend who believes that if something were to somehow travel at the speed of light, there would be a "gravity boom", where a wave of gravity would just accumulate at the front of the object.

I really didn't want to post this on /x/ so im here now. Are tulpas possible? if so, why can they exist? what are you doing to your mind when creating one?

I've never taken the test, but I'm quite confident it's around 100

Working on many things, mostly just self-studying the three main categories of "hard science" (biology, chemistry, and physics). If you meant what your job is then I can't disclose

I dwell on intelligence, I'm pissed off that my limits are determined by something I have no real control over. And I dwell on the mind. I like thinking about thinking, how humans categorize and organize data, and then applying this logic to make my own interpretations of the world from my interpretation of correct thought. My stupidity means that it's always incorrect and far from what's been proven though.

I don't believe in any higher power, and I think the chances of there being one are quite negligible, so I guess I'm an atheist.

Judging only from what ive read, I think science is doing okay. China is dumping money into R&D and Europe is working towards even more unification (at least in terms of academia), but the US and Canada could use some work.

>>9764717
>Defining something by a size scale is dumb.
Microbiology BTFO