/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12151268
yeah, obviously. lol dude did you even read any of my posts? That is what this was about from the beginning. I have been trying to explain to you WHY women have permanent breasts in the first place and then WHY they get large and WHY men are attracted to them. It is an interesting problem because it at first seems like it shouldnt have happened at all. You literally just restated the assumptions of my whole argument. My thesis is that women evolved modern PERMANENT breasts to use as deception, as a contrast to other mammals, and men had to develop an attraction in order to compete. I'm sad I wasted so much time arguing with someone who cant even read.

>>12117316
>There's still a lot of empty, unused space.
Yes there is, and it should stay that way, instead of being used to support billions of people for no reason.
>Build more cities
City life isnt worth perpetuating, it is the most demoralizing, alienating, psycholgically punishing, and depressing means of life man has ever conceived other than being a galley slave
>Raise more livestock
And use even more land?
>Harvest crops more efficiently
Current modes of agriculture are already hugely efficient in terms of yield/acre, but they are largely unsustainable. Indoor/Hydroponics could be a solution but idk
Again, I agree we can support more people, but there is no point, and it makes the world worse for everyone. Imagine how great it would be to live in an America with an eighth of its population today, how free and open it would feel