/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12778478
>>12778474
in the new render there are more triangles. Looks more feasible imo.

>>12169746
The window is segmented, so if one panel is hit by something, it won't destroy a huge portion of the window, but only a small section
if they build it out of some kind of polymer, shattering wont be a issue, and holes can be patched

>>11791268
I disagree. At the pace they're going i would be really surprised if we didn't see a 2022 freight mission. Especially since a freight starship doesn't need nearly as much extras to iron out.

>>11728040
>They're dead ends, because by the time they would fly, F9 would be getting phased out in favor of SS/SH.
what is their best course of action then? Just rely on spacex?

>>11705489
>kneeling to the CHAD starship
BASED

Soon enough, aerospace engineering and other closely related fields.

>>11683943
The only real difference is WHAT they worship. The difference between a theist and an atheist is that the theist often tries to ascend from degeneracy. This is why many vocal atheists are often faggots/trannies/plebbitor consoomers/all of the above.

>>11625567
this, but with lunar Starships

>>11592210
it takes more energy to slow then dock with gateway and taking a lander down, instead of just orbiting then landing directly on the surface anyway

>>11355583
yeah, if you think about it not much stopping even a modest millionaire from spending ~$10-15mil on their own personal launch with inflatable habitats and some willing crew to set it up

Can't wait.