/sci/ - Science & Math

God this thread is funny, sure you guys love to jerk it to analytic math and physics, but when a soft science comes into play you guys go full retard.

Try 95.49296585513720146133025802350861722067578744% of pi.

So /sci/, how do I go about determining the validity of a study? Is there a good way of determine if a source or a particular study is heavily flawed or biased at all, or which common sources are known for screwing things up? I want to go through those race studies that you always find reposted on /pol/ to see if it says what people believe or if people are just talking studies and warping them for their own use.

>>1804080
>'You people'?
>'Our demise'
>engineers create redundant products

sure is generalisation in here, isn't that right mr labcoat wearing anti-social virgin nerdy scientist?