/sci/ - Science & Math

>Why does science acknowledge the variance of intelligence between dog breeds, but does not acknowledge the variance of intelligence between human races?

Because dogs aren't people, dogs don't have a sketchy past of writing laws to undermine or benefit particular groups, they do not wage wars against each other that spans entire countries, continents and the globe itself.

They don't have to worry about dogs lynching other dogs on trees, they don't have to worry about dog gangs shooting bystander and police dogs, they don't have to worry about dogs trading each other for slave dogs across the ocean.

There is no holy crusades of dog kind between different religions, they don't have to worry about dogs blowing themselves up in public, they don't have to worry about dogs burning down churches nor do they have to worry about a sect of dogs claiming themselves to be chosen ones to rule over all others.

In other words scientists trust dogs more than they trust humans with such information. Hell I would trust virtually any other species with such information more than humans.

We as a species can't be trusted. Also most people don't know about the stochastic process/control concepts and would rather become some closet occultist who believes in numerology.