[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:

View post   
>> No.5919327 [View]
File: 728 KB, 1120x508, 1324993566749.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5919327

>> No.5511212 [View]
File: 728 KB, 1120x508, CyberneticArmProsthesis.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5511212

>>5511185

Prepare yourself.

>> No.4142223 [View]
File: 728 KB, 1120x508, 1312134944439.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4142223

>>4141793
I am not an attempt to be snarky.

Besides, the comparison IS apt. Both pioneered by inventive people, then it becomes available to the wealthy. Finally, after the technology matures a bit more and the production methods are refined and streamlined, it becomes cheap enough for the middle-class.

I doubt there will be tourist-class augmentations for the poorfags. But you never know.

>> No.3483665 [View]
File: 728 KB, 1120x508, 1308408516609.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3483665

>> No.3245717 [View]
File: 728 KB, 1120x508, CyberneticArmProsthesis.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3245717

Mechanical augmentation or nano-augmentation?

Which one do you think we should focus on? Should we use the former as a stepping stone towards the latter? Perhaps a use a different approach?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]