/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8591961
The false data propaganda crowd is still much bigger. Doesn't mean they're right.
99% of scientists were against Galileo. How did that one work out?
They even locked him away and had him renounce his discoveries. OP and the rest of you are the 2017 version of them, you must be proud.

If you can't tell the difference between weather and climate change you're a retard! It's not getting colder, these predictions say so. Stop looking at reality and the actual data over the past thirty years! It doesn't fit our narrative! DENIERS!
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-38546998

>>8552760

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQV3i95qzCM&t=955s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLuBgZ1bgoY

Soooooooooooooo, can we start approaching this all from a scientific basis and put the emotion away now? Please?

This is what Earth looks like in Winter, i.e. right now. Notice anything? Now why do you suppose you never see this view from space, when they're talking about "climate change".......because it doesn't fit the narrative. Here's the thing no Environut has ever been able to explain to me.
The co2 in the Earths atmosphere is currently sitting at about 400ppm. Plant life on our little ball here dies at levels slightly below 200ppm co2. Plant life thrives best at levels of 1000ppm+ co2. That is why ALL indoor greenhouses artificially raise the level of co2 to at least 1000ppm co2 to encourage better plant growth. This is a fucking fact, look it up.
Now.......why would plant life on Earth evolve to grow best at co2 levels of 1000+ppm, if that wasn't more in line with the long term history of Earths atmosphere? It wouldn't.
If anything we currently have a dangerously LOW level of co2 in the atmosphere. Plant life is currently 200ppm away from dying, and at least 600ppm away from optimal conditions.

Ok Environuts.......please explain to me why the plants are lying?.........waiting