/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15732562
>i'm still voting
Ok, golem. This time it'll work. lol

>>15224346
>y thought patterns shifted towards being war more graph theoretic and recursive. My programming style is far more aligned to using formal verification.
>Aside from all the intellectual benefit, it's just an overwhelmingly beautiful and blissful experience.
>In this moment, I am euphoric, because I'm enlightened by my own intelligence.

>Everyone gets to live a life of luxury, spending time with friends and loved ones.
These people actually believe it...

>>14785779
>the effect causes the cause

>it's uhhh... transformative

>unlike the philosophy of math, which is properly math.

>the riddle is stated in an ambiguous fashion. That's a fact.

>>14708736
>the best way to tell if you're a larping 1 is if you can draw an apple perfectly
I don't believe "people" who think this is a logical line of thought are truly human. It's impossible to have any degree of self-reflection and still think this is correct.

>>14708562
>Great! Now show where those 90,000,000,000 people are going to get their water, their food, and the various minerals and elements we need for developed 21st lifestyle.
You're a 19th century Englishman. Show where 8 billion people are going to get their water, their food, and the various minerals and elements we need for developed 19th century lifestyle. I know that guy is trolling you, but it still seems like Malthusian morons just never learn.

>>14686623
No, I'm saying that because the line between orange and red is arbitrary, the difference between red and blue is arbitrary. I am a very nuanced thinker.

>>14641267
>The question is: are you a victim of mass surveillance or does the government care about you in particular? I don't doubt mass surveillance.
Imagine being so astoundingly idiotic that you think that if you're not being literally and actively targeted by the CIA, then mass surveillance isn't being used against you. I don't know anymore. Imagine if enough people picked up arms and managed to bring down these Orwellian nightmare governments. Then what? You have "people" like this making up half of the population, if not the majority. Nothing would change until they are removed from society.

>you can't just draw conclusions from your le heckin' senses
>they're just le evolootionary tricks meant to make you survive
>you should totally trust abstract, purely imaginary models based on deductively invalid logic applied to observations gathered from your le heckin' senses, though
Modern soiece is a mental illness.

>I'm a proud Cartesian dualist.

>The word irregardless always triggers some midwits.

>>14558916
>big pharma good because [media corporation] said [pharma corporation] cured cancer (N=18)
>please don't ask why the modern population is so cancer-ridden in the first place

>if something is, there is no reason other things ought not to be. Hence, if something is, everything is. If on the other hand nothing truly is, then in totality nothing exists at all.

>You are misattributing the scientific method to philosophers.
Imagine being this mentally ill.

>"Some A are A" is an invalid proposition
Hahahaha. Holy shit. This cretin actually thinks he's some kind of intellectual while being unable to grasp logic in its most basic form.

>>14522322
>God you people are stupid.
>factcheck.afp.com
Pffffffffff. Also, see >>14522268

>>14516420
>it’s my personal belief that all life is as “intelligent” as any other life on Earth, because the most important thing a life form needs to do is survive and reproduce

>>11525634
>when the bottle is empty?
OP confirmed brainlet.

>>11461261
>I know I would be good at maths if I actually tried
>I just haven't actually tried yet
Based cope anon

>>11401936
>that guy that keeps asking questions and stalling the class