/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5776627

>/b/

>>5152006
>>5152015
you niglets flip out over this, but totally missed this one:
>>5151444

>>4924386
>look up astronomers on youtube

learn to read, smart stuff

ITT: faggots who can't into Goedel

PV = nRT
P1V1/T1 = P2V2/T2
volume is arbitrary, so:
P2 = P1*T2/T1
P(room temp) = P(273K)*(room temp)/273
make sure everything is in Kelvin when doing gas law

bitches don't know bout dat Df

>Monoamine neurotransmitters are neurotransmitters and neuromodulators that contain one amino group that is connected to an aromatic ring by a two-carbon chain (-CH2-CH2-).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monoamine_neurotransmitter
FFS.

No it's not normal and I hate you for being that way.

If someone is a preoperative heterosexual transsexual (that is, they are attracted to people of their biological gender but identify as the opposite), is it gay for him to admire himself in the mirror while touching himself?
Discuss.

>>3615430
how did i know you'd say that.
http://www2.wiwi.hu-berlin.de/wpol/schumpeter/pdf/Voth.pdf
You know even less about history than you do about economics.

>>3486720
Nah bro, it was >>3486682 that ruined the thread.
>oh hai, I don't have a question to ask, so I'll ask people to ask questions in my thread instead of making their own threads about their own questions

>>3461568
>>3461626

Think of a name that's based on something more insightful about the role of genetics in the larger picture of the universe. Not something that sounds myopic faggy angst about your genes.

>>3262297
>>3262258
>Yeah, i wear this lab-coat ironically.
Fucking hipsters man, this guy is probably (fuck it, with absolute certitude) a thousand times smarter than you. Fucking Edward Teller was so impressed with him at an early age that he made him his protégé, can you fucking beat that?

He freely admits that he is an optimist, a position that is purely subjective and does in no way diminish his work, his credibility or any statements that he has made. For one has to evaluate his work and actions based on merit, not subjective classification. Not to mention that his goal of trying to popularize science (a la Sagan) is a noble one.

To be brief: he is more qualified than any of you to speak on the matter of science and its future.

Posting in this thread will make you choke on a million dicks.

You -cannot- prove meHARGHLBLGRHALTHPGARGLE

>>3114912