/sci/ - Science & Math

>not knowing Elon BS yet

>>12539892
Think about it.

>>12511959
Big 5? More like Big gay.

>>12505029
Time doesn't exist, it has shown in T-symmetry we have the concept of """time""" because we have memory, but it really doesn't exist this is the failure on GR take an inexistent thing like a dimmension

>>12381962
>the whole debate was whether its possible or not
It's not.
>not how long would it take
It's impossible so this is the wrong question. How long would it take to jump 100 meters in the air? Stupid question, it's impossible.
>>12381978
How does parallel cointossing work?

>>12323106
Tell me the answer to
[math]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{sin(n)}{n^2} [/math]
(which according to you sums to a real number) without embarrassing yourself and then I will get over it.

>>12295123
Go back to crystal cafe tranny.

/lit/ did it again
>>>/lit/16339661

>>11671974
creative

>>11612472
All debunked, see:
>https://www.jsmp.dk/posts/2019-06-16-talebiq/
Also, he isn't qualified to comment on the field:
> He holds an MBA from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania (1983),[21][9] and a PhD in Management Science from the University of Paris (Dauphine) (1998),[25] under the direction of Hélyette Geman.[25] His dissertation focused on the mathematics of derivatives pricing.[25][26]

>>11610207
Who stops the bribers from getting bribed?

>>11610083
>And preferably from someone not under the age of 18
Says the faggot flexing about his IQ on the Internet. Do you know what the funny thing is? Most IQ tests, especially the most common ones, like WAIS-R, don't claim to accurately test above 130+ (very superior). So, it's pretty obvious you're a clueless retard just shitposting.

>>11606279
Nice strawman, no professional or expert claims that IQ tests 100% test intelligence, which is why the modules of IQ tests have different g-loadings. But yeah, you probably didn't know that, or if you did, probably didn't understand it. Unless, of course, you are just being a disingenuous fuck.

>you DO believe in eternalism, right anon?