/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5751914

Google.Scholar on "consciousness":
About 2.220.000 Results (0,06 Sec.)

Try again. You have reached a point were you might just want to change your view of the topic instead of finding more and more ways to justify your initial belief. Don't be afraid to learn, my friend.

>>5303417

Introversion is part of the topics that are studied in differential and personality psychology. I don't see how this thread is NOT about psychology.

>>5303416
I will always read it in his voice.

>>5288837
>189
Clearly doesn't know anything about statistics.
Oh god, my sides.

The more important question is:
Why do people on sci feel qualified enough to answer questions about fields they don't have any expertise in?

Every psychology related thread is flooded with pretentious faggots spouting their OPINIONS and ancedotal "evidence" when there actually is data for a simple answer.

A lot of pro-social/anti-social choice experiments involve some kind of gambling-paradigm, where the subject can decide to donate or keep his winnings.

That aside, your planned experiment seems to lack internal validity, to me. You want to specifically test online-groups, do you? Then you should have your experiment in an online environment too.

Are you from social psychology, btw? I'm doing my thesis in biopsych atm.