/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11978869
is that the one where you multiply by 10 then subtract the number?
I do it that way

>[math]x\cdot 9[/math]
[math]x\cdot 10 - x[/math]
>[math]7\cdot 6[/math]
7 14 21 times two is 42
>7x8
memorized as 5678
>squares
memorized

now my dirty secret is that I have not memorized anything else
or rather I know the sequences. I do not know what 7x5 is for instance.
Sometimes I start at 25 and then do two more fives for 35
other times I go 7 14 21 28 35 in my head

basically everything is such a sequence
8x6 is 8 16 24 *2 -> 48

if the numbers are larger than 10 I might drop my sequences and instead start looking for factors or multiplying by the closest 10th and subtracting or something like that though.
But still, [math]13*17 = 13*20 - x = 13*10*2 - x = 260 - 13*3 = 260 - 13 - 13 - 13[/math]

t. studying stats

>>10829493
>What exactly about human behavior is so thoroughly profound and untouchable that AI has zero chance of matching or exceeding it?

Because nobody will invent an AI that is an unpredictable retard that will get angry because someone looked at it the wrong way.

What is the optimal age for a man to start breeding?

What is your opinion on this /sci/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=29s&v=EFwa5Owp0-k

>>9664228
I know this feel except I failed in high school and sortof worked my way up from there and the transition to uni was pretty smooth

>>9667353
I would not mind dropping to 140cm for a nice boost of 30 points desu
the only issue I see is reaching stuff on higher shelves but I could always use a chair for that

> Automated tasks
> Programmed by Computers
> Doing real Science

https://discord.gg/NKk8mJ

They have to know what you are translating || you have to have huge space in there.

Cognitive pattern rendered by tessellation with proper dithering can be important.

One can't check it, we still not have some information equity. We will see who is equal more then, rendering equality obsolete.