/sci/ - Science & Math

>curious about the "greatest unsolved problem in mathematics"
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann_hypothesis#Consequences_of_the_Riemann_hypothesis
>"The practical uses of the Riemann hypothesis include" etc.
>read through the so-called "practical uses"
>mfw

I'm doing buisness/econ related calc and finding derivatives, but having a problem understanding how I find the equation of the tangent line in the following problem.

f(x)= 3+ln x ; with x=1

now I get why f'(x) is 1/x, but it says the equation for the line tangent should be y = x+2. Where the fuck is that coming from, could somebody explain it please?

I understand why the derivative

>>3290284
>chores get married man laid.
>....with his wife.

mfw

go derper

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/27/AR2009032702825.html

Ignoring the fact that condoms are, in part, responsible for a change in mindset which encourages illicit premarital sex, along with multiple partners, thus exacerbating the AIDs crisis in Africa, the Pope seems to be on the right track in another sense, also.
Article related.

Also, /sci/ fucking sucks. I'm Catholic and I come here for science related stuff, not hurr durr atheism versus religion threads. Additionally, I wish all you purported /sci/entists would really evaluate what you apply your beloved scientific method to. Your rationalism extends only far enough to cover others beliefs while conveniently excluding your own. If you have to talk about religion on a board dedicated to science, then at least research and get your facts right like any good scientist would do.

How can you not see the massive hypocrisy? In no way do I mean that to be an insult. It is utter incredulity.

Seriously guys, are you going to argue about such an obvious example of false dichotomy?

>>1889252
Josef, I am disappoint.

fucking biologists, man. it's like Godel and Heisenberg never happened in their version of reality. unique fucking snowflakes that know it all.

>>1697275
shut the FUCK UP DONNIE!

>mfw Richard Dawkins isn't on the list

>>1590071
im excited. been telling people about it for a while now.

>>1413603
>not troll thread, just ignorant thread.

>percieve
I before e, except after c, dude.