/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15389941
>Greyhounds are faster than wolves
Oh no no no no
-"The fastest recorded speed of an Arctic wolf is 46 mph. You may think of a wolf as a solitary animal, but Arctic wolves travel in packs of six or so. These wolves live in incredibly cold climates, so they rarely encounter people."
-"The highest verified speed of a greyhound was 41.8 miles per hour"
Google it yourself faggot
>wolves pretty poor olfactory sensitivity compared to breeds like bloodhounds
More of your bullshit
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4859551/
"Pretty poor" is wildly wrong. They are at the very least effectively identical (with wolves possibly being significantly better than dogs because retesting the wolves in the scent experiment showed enormous improvement over dogs). This aligns with my claim that no dog outperforms the wolf ancestors.
Like I said, most people don't realize we can't breed dogs to outperform their ancestors.
Thanks for proving my point.
>>15390027
>Eskimos have timy noses so they can heat up the cold air when they breathe
Nice clueless armchair argument. Meanwhile, you also think (ie swallow the narrative) the ginormous noses of the homo sapiens you randomly call "Neanderthal" are well adapted for cold climates because they are big. Funny how the benefit of nose size in cold climate flip flops whenever you need it to suit your argument
>Do you think
I think you can't think for yourself