/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14547995
>genetic distance is not how we determine speciation anyways so this is retarded
You are a moron. We determine species via shit far simpler than genetics. Even geographical distance is enough if retard evolutionists feel like it is.
>polar bear claw vs a grizzly bear claw. there is no analogue like that
They are perfectly homologous structures, one protrudes a bit in the middle and is larger, no greater difference than the sagittal crest variation we see among breeds of dogs, yet we call these bears separate species instead of breeds. You are being disingenuous as fuck.
>there is no analogue like that except in something like the Bajau people
You even admit there are "examples" in humans HAHA
Other anon's points are completely valid. You just want to stonewall because you've lost the argument