/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11094115
>Your own graph is a perfect illustration of why TSI change can't account for current climate change thanks,

It was in an uptrend until very recently.. including the start of the industrial revolution up until 1985??? You should also answer why it changed correlation! This is probably wrong but could it be that the atmosphere has trapped a lot of the heat energy from when the sun was getting hotter and the sun just randomly is getting colder?

I agree that human emissions probably have a heating effect on the environment but looking at the data there seems to be much more to the story and again IT'S SUSPECT THAT YOU GUYS AND ALL THE DUMB ARTICLES ABOUT GW FAIL TO ADDRESS THE NUANCES OF THE DATA SUCH AS SOLAR CORRELATION.

>there is no massive trend, current warming has only been occurring after the industrial revolution

I'm talking about the correlation with the solar TSI.. also what caused the medieval warming period? And the trend started at approximately 1800 which is BEFORE SIGNIFICANT EMISSIONS!!! It's obvious when you zoom out that our planet was about to enter a warming cycle anyway.. along with the sun!

>TSI has been decreasing while the earth has been warming
Literally 35 years.. that is nothing. That is like flipping out about 5 minute candles when you are trading trends on the daily!

>but it can't be the cause of current warming.
It would also be stupid to ASSUME emissions are the only cause of global warming!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> "DUDE IT SOUNDS FISHY!!!"

It objectively DOES sound fishy and they are only proposing one solution which is GIVING THEM MORE MONEY AND POWER... Come on dude. Tell me why that doesnt sound fishy then???