/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15140643
>I took it and I felt abloobloo
Not a qualified medical opinion.
>I know a guy who took it and…
Anecdotal.

>>14755911
This is not correct, but it’s an understandable mistake, as people have been making it for hundreds of years when contemplating infinity for the purposes of, e.g., theology. To get a more sophisticated idea of infinity you need only study calculus, then real analysis and measure theory.

Set theory is nice too, but it is farther removed from real-world things like weights and probabilities, which is what your argument is based on and which therefore is where you should start

>>14679364
I want to know what kind of agency is behind this literal-who, getting him access to all the good interviewees

I could do his job much better than he does. Ditch lex and hire me