/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5886846
>>5886591

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinality_of_the_continuum

"Between any two real numbers a < b, no matter how close they are to each other, there are always infinitely many other real numbers"

Did you even go to grade school OP?

>>5104983
>grammer fundamental
>correcting for grammer on 4chan message boards

Of course I correct for grammer/spelling in actual things of importance.

There is a big difference between publishing a paper and posting on 4chan. If you don't realize this you win the dumbfuck of the day award.

>>4949236
How the fuck is engineering and technology, not s subset of science?

Are you fucking retarded?

>>4930421
>implying anyone gives a fuck about your sob story

>>4911337
>implying democrats hate space explortaion

0/10

Are you even trying?

>>3967406
>chem, physics

It means you should he a chemist or physicist. Why the fuck would you want to become an engineer? Do you have a mental disability?

>>3877162
>nope

Since, matter and anti-matter destroy each other, it is only possible for one form to dominate the universe. Once one "get's" the upper hand, then the universe will be dominated by that form for its duration.

Since alot of particles, can be anti-matter and matter at the same time, all you need it is the right set of interactions to cause matter to be favored, and break the initial matter antimatter symmetry. (ie the matter/anti-matter particles destroy more anti-matter particles then matter particles, in the early universe). This upsets the balance and causes a matter avalanche.

This will happen becuase the weak interaction is not symmetric when it comes to handedness.

>>3833442
I don't think you understand how science or physics works. You need proof to "believe" something. YOU NEED EXPERIMENTAL PROOF!

If you decide just to believe shit without experimental proof to support your claims, YOU AREN'T DOING SCIENCE OR PHYSICS! (have fun in your religious bullshit kid). You already sound as dumb as a christian.

There is no proof that anything can travel FTL, so allowing v to go FTL is not a conclusion you can make scientifically. Futhermore, Special relativity was expressly developed with c as the light speed limit.

It was one of the restrictions used when making the theory. If this restriction were not present WE WOULDNT GET SPECIAL RELATIVITY. We would get a totally different theory with a different framework.

If we ever do discover FTL, WE wont use special relativity (since it is fundementally embedded with a lightspeed limit). We will use a different theory, that approximates to special relativity in the proper instances.

Ok, nevermind then /sci/.
I guess ya'll aren't mature enough to handle real science. Have fun with your pop-science and trolls.

>>3746284
>How close are we to curing aging

Pretty far away.
However my research into curing life is almost complete.

I experiment mostly on christian school girls late at night (cause christians are so gullible, and girls are fun to rape).

I have a 98% sucess rate at curing these girls.

We should be ready to start mass testing our method on the entire christian population by January. Everything is looking very optimistic, and there are suprisingly alot of wealthy benefactors eager to fund our work.

>>3684922
Bitch don't know about my infinities