[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.1819271 [View]
File: 8 KB, 207x180, index.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1819271

Would the OP please take a moment to establish how one may prove or disprove "God"?

For instance is it enough to disprove one kind of God? Say the pantheon of the vikings?

Or should we not count those in the same way we count capital g God?

May we disprove by logic? And if so what form - are we allowed to merely show that the beliefs people hold of him are inconsistent? Would that be proof enough?

Would it be fair to prove that a loving, good, whole, and giving life is possible without God - thereby establishing that the counter proff of his necessity is obviated for daily conditions. Or should we carry it further and establish that a functionally equivalent existence can be had in all cases where God doesn't exist - just as much as if he did. And then by Occams Razor remove the unnecessary assumption?

What OP - What is it you think will satisfy your condition of proving or disproving God?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]