/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15202252
>Can you give something to read about this like wikipedia pages

Try his diary. If only they would release the other parts, wonder why they didn't?

>>15033955
>Or just a condition
What is being "conditioned"?
>in which the electric and magnetic fields continuously reverse direction
And this is "traveling" to you? This is a speed? There is no actual "wave", it's disparity. Hysteresis. Of what though?
>electricity is a "wave" that forms
No no. "Electricity is a hertzian waveform".

from the flow of electrons down (well, technically up) the gradient of an electric potential.
There is nothing flowing through the copper wire. It's solid.

>The presence of more electrons in a particular place creates a net force along and to the surface of a wire.
It's a field form. It has nothing to do with electrons. "Electrons" are simply a means of quantifying this disparity of medium being perturbed.

>Ok, well, people who use the model of electromagnetism described in Maxwell's equations can create generators, motors, turbines, power plants, transformers, batteries, power lines, along with the rest of modern technology.
I'm glad they can all take advantage of 100+ year principles and abuse them by making "new" rotating magnetic field devices, such as the really really big one at CERN. Oh and then there's the "jam pack dielectrics closer this time and call it "modern"" type of tech where we pretend we couldn't have just done that 50+ years ago.
It's just repetitive, redundant, boring and not really intriguing is all (because it's all the same shit essentially). None of them can actually show proof of this electron particle. None of them can even explain how a magnet works. And you think describing these facts mean anything?


>People who use your empty, schizo model of electricity
What model would that be? Also "Electricity: the hertzian waveform" is one of the schizo models of electrification.

>>15011364
In this example "space" has more omnipotence then God.

>>15011390
And the fairy tale that space exists and can be "occupied" when all you can show is "occupied space"

>>15010379
>I have a box full of those as paradoxes of maths
Yes yes I'm sure you can go on and on listing irrational after irrational and calling the products "math". But that would be retarded, and not actually math (because it's not a quantity).

>Begone, acolyte, you have no business with me.
I think the problem is that you think math and geometry are the same thing. They aren't and this specific reason is why.

>>15010274
Acknowledging Einstein or any of his flawed works that have no basis in realty in any fashion is midwit tier. It helps perpetuate the psychosis that...it does make sense somehow. Some even now believe that any of the work he did somehow has to do with the invention of the atomic bomb or GPS. It's sad because if you ask them "how", most of the time they sit there and piss on themselves unable to reply. Really it's for the benefit of those people, it's saving them from the inevitable embarrassment they'll get dished once someone with a brain comes in to correct the record, or even worse ask them where they were taught such untrue nonsense.
But what it's really saving them from is having to attempt at trying to explain Einsteins actual work, it really is hilariously stupid. They attempt at simply redescribing his model "Spacetime" as best they can only to get reminded how stupid and nonsensical it is in the first place when they go and try and explain it. Space warps? How? They have no idea how and the only thing they can show you that's warped is the sour expression on their face once you ask them this simple question.

>>14978218
synonymous
syn·on·y·mous
adjective
(of a word or phrase) having the same or nearly the same meaning as another word or phrase in the same language.
closely associated with or suggestive of something.

There, my reply is now in the form of a definition to satisfy your autism. Hope it clarifies how useless your posts have been so you don't waste time making another.

>>14978230
>magnetism is 1 dimensional
You should be ashamed of yourself you absolute crackpot.

>Cool. Way to ignore everything I post
I'm gonna start ignoring it more now.

>I described it
And this is exactly why I'm going to ignore it more.

>>14949458
>Point being, immigrants or no, there was no "two weeks and it'll be over" scenario.
An extremely poor point because if there were no immigrants then there would have never been a "scenario" to speak about in the first place.

>The virus was spread worldwide
>because of immigrants

>before we knew about it in January 2020.
good thing someone shut down the immigrants from the source of it.

>Unless you could literally lock down the entire world for several months
Where the fuck have you been for the last two years? Wake up before you really get fucked.