/sci/ - Science & Math

How can you believe in evolution if it is just a theory (a geuss)?

>>6355850
How can you believe in evolution if it's just a theory (a geuss)?

>>6058978

How can you believe in evolution if it's just a theory (a geuss)?

How can you believe in nuclear fusion if it's just a theory (a geuss)?

How can you believe in neuroscience if it's just a theory (a geuss)?

hey bro

How can you believe in evolution if it's just a theory (a geuss)?

How will evolutionists respond to this paper? It's hard to see how they could dismiss it. Maybe they will try to mock it as old Arabian numerology, or religiously inspired (since Kazakhstan, which funded the study, is 70% Muslim). Those would be unfair criticisms. The authors have Russian names, certified doctorates, and wrote in collaboration with leading lights in the West. Or perhaps critics could argue that the authors hail from a foreign country whose name has too many adjacent consonants in it to take them seriously.

No, it appears the only way out for Darwinists would be the "Dawkins Dodge." You may remember that one from the documentary Expelled, where Dawkins admits the possibility of panspermia for Earth, so long as the designers themselves evolved by a Darwinian process.

What's most notable about this paper is the similarity in design reasoning between the authors and the more familiar advocates of intelligent design theory. No appeals to religion or religious texts; no identifying the designer; just logical reasoning from effect to sufficient cause. The authors even applied the "design filter" by considering chance and natural law, including natural selection, before inferring design.

If Darwinists want to go on equating intelligent design with creationism, they will now have to take on the very secular journal Icarus.

how can you beleive in evolution if it is just a theory (a geuss)?

How can you believe in evolution if it is just a theory (a geuss)?

how can you beleive in evolution if it is just a theory (a geuss)?

>>3981431
>If this is true, why does anything ever die?

The "entropy of DNA" (I coined that): Telomere shortening.

But that's just one theory (a geuss).

>>3953920
Btw I'm just gaussing based on the names of these things. I have no clue, and have never taken accounting.

How can you argue against the importance of "IQ" when it's the single greatest predictor of job performance? (for all jobs and all people)

>>3802350
here you go

trollan is fun, isn't it?

That sounds like a theory (a geuss).

This guy here has been posted more often, long before Costanza became a meme.

How can you believe biology is a hard science when it's just rote memorization (for women)?

How can u beleive in evilution if its just a theory, a geuss?

>evilution
>more than a theory (a geuss)

ishygddt

How can u beleive in evilution if its just a theory a geuss?

How can you believe in biology when it's just memorization (a parret)?