/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10392775
That graph is not derived from the climate chart of Christian Dietrich Schonwiese, he never made one, it's an extrapolation of his work on the Holocene period, 60 year old studies and some other random studies, and makes extreme assumptions based on the whims of the author.
It is quite literally made by an intelligent yet batshit insane person, a dangerous combination, and pretty fucking far from how you actually conduct scientific reviews of subjects.
https://www.eike-klima-energie.eu/2011/10/05/teil-8-dynamisches-sonnensystem-die-tatsaechlichen-hintergruende-des-klimawandels/

Here's the actual fucking data it claims to be based on which this madman converted to fit his agenda. Notice the slight changes of the Y-axis from -1 to 1.5 to 10 - 17. A minor modification.

>>8540396

I can guess

>>7051403
ho ho ho

data sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Holocene_Temperature_Variations.png#Data_Sources

>>6009740
And then consider the next step up in scale.

>>6009741
That's plainly untrue.

>>5425070
>>5425075

Here is a picture of the temperature of the Earth over the last 12,000 years. A tiny glimpse of a speck of the Earth's long life, which you seem to be blissfully ignorant of. I got it from Wikipedia here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temperature_record

Now tell me that there is some sort of non-predictable trend (gods and al gore magic aside) with global temperatures, and at the helm of that ship barreling out of control is our "carbon footprint".

You know your theory is shit when it crumbles under the slightest critical inquiry.

>implying global warming doesn't into real

>>4124625
With all due respect (ie. not much), that's an outright lie.
The warming period after the last ice age actually ended a long time ago and we should now be in a cooling period.

Hence picture.