/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16144522
The thing is that over, say, the last billion years some stars must have come even closer. Maybe we used to be a distant binary and our companion star got captured or scattered by an interloper

Asking here since ChatGPT wont give good answer:
It's known that many thought Apollo was a precurser to much bigger operations,
But were any apollo missions actually tasked with things related to lunar settlement?
Did any missions recon the terrain for that purpose?

>>15776512
The SpaceX part will work fine, NASA/oldspace will kill them. Whether that's where public blame is fixed is another matter

>>15415930
Why are popsci mushminds afraid of neutrons? idgi

>>15343588
Agree with this and also if the Orbiter was pulled for safety concerns, the US would still have a heavy lift launcher

>>15311317
>democrats want to kill american spaceflight
A evidently true statement that drives some anons into crazy levels of denial. Why is this?

> 30 minutes when there wasn't /sfg/ on /sci/
I'm still shaking bros :(