[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.9011654 [View]
File: 1.08 MB, 1066x538, east coast.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9011654

(cont)

Just look at this map. This is one of the most densely populated, most industrialized region of the entire world. You can see human settlements in a greyish color. Green stuff is forests, grasslands, etc. It doesn't take a genius to see there is way less CO2 producing areas than CO2 consuming areas - and again, this is one of the world's most populated, most industrialized areas, which means for most of the world, which is underdeveloped, there is even more green to grey -. This is not to mention how most photosynthesis happens on oceans, which cover 70% of the Earth's surface, and have way more algae than the Amazon rain forest has trees. Again, it doesn't take a genius to just look at these maps and question the narrative that humans are destroying the planet. You could comfortably put all of humanity in area roughly the size of Tunisia, maintaining the population density of Singapore, and the rest of the world would run wild with its CO2 consuming plants, algae, bacteria. I could go on forever. Cars and factories don't operate 24/7, when there are way more living beings that exhale CO2 24/7 than there are cars and factories. Earth has had so many climate changes in the past, remember snowball Earth? Yeah. Unless you believe cavemen were also significantly contributing to global warming with the invention of fire, that was something major that humans did not trigger.

>polite sage
You don't know what this means newfriend. Which isn't really surprising since you're posting /pol/ content out of the blue.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]