/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6734638
I'm not surprised to see a lot of INTPs on /sci/. That being said, on your test it says that you only have a SLIGHT preference in Introversion, Thinking, and Perceiving, so that may describe some of the inaccuracy of the description.

Personally, after getting multiple variations in my type from the test (first I got ESFP, then ENFP, and now ENTP), I'd say it'd be more realistic to just take a cognitive functions test.

The cognitive functions are what Jung originally theorized. The Myers-Briggs / Keirsey interpretations are just attempts to classify and organize them into groups. But as we all know, humans are extremely complex and not always subject to being classified within one of the 16 predefined, cookie cutter roles.

All that being said, I still find it all fascinating and have found great insight into who I am and how I view the world from personality theory and think that encouraging others to do the same is wise.