/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15372487
>aftwerward by richard dawkins
Imagine God living so rent free in your head that you, as a biologist who knows nothing of physics, have to shill some physicist's cope filled book that tries to hand wave away the fact it's always going to be illogical for something to come from nothing all because your idiot atheist belief system is more illogical than believing in a prime mover.

>>15160215
>no its not at all. its unsubstantiated religious dogma that is contradicted by physics.
You are insane
>picrel. temp doesnt help you in the slightest. upper atmos is hottest
WHo are you even talking to? You asked a completely idiotic request for an altitude without understanding that it is dependent on fluctuating temperature.
>begging the question fallacy.
Gravity exists. It's not beggin the question in any way.
>yet another begging the question fallacy.
You don't know what a "begging the question fallacy" is. A statement isn't a begging the question fallacy.
>objectively, if you built a container of ANY SIZE and sealed it, it could be made to have the EXACT same gradient we have on earth (since the container is ON EARTH lol)
There is no defined gradient on earth because it's not constant. What is the height of the ocean on a beach? Give a mathematical model of this height.
>yes there is. the gas pressure BELOW the layer that was just replaced with a a 10^-17 TORR vacuum
This is an outright lie. Provide emprical proof of this claim. Your silly MS paint nonsense isn't proof.
>you cannot substantiate this and its contradictory to all empirical evidence and the known laws of physics.
Shove this right back up your ass and give evidence of former claim.
>per the 2nd Law of thermodynamics
How many university level thermodynamics classes have you taken? I've taken 3.