/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14546243
>1st because species is a made up term
We addressed this in the article you linked me, that I replied to here:>>14546159
Race is defined as "subspecies" according to your accepted nomenclature you shared with me.
>2nd because polar bears and brown bears don't breed
They can and do. They're from the same continent and are more closely related than different species of humans.
>3rd because humans have never at any time in their history been isolated enough to be considered different species
Humans have been separated by continents and oceans for thousands of years. Another invalid argument.
>4th because separating humans into different species is the first step in horrible atrocities
You're creating horrible attrocities by failing to acknowledge reality and inject your politics into science.

>>14546244
>Sure, you're "just asking questions"
Yes, but nobody is answering them. They're calling me "racist" telling me "go back to /pol/" instead of answering them rationally.
>yet refuse to do any reading on human taxonomy
I've done plenty, and based my questions on these principles.

>>14546254
>that's a good thought but you're barking up the wrong tree imo.
No need for hyperbole.
>there are not enough consistent differences between people of different races
There's plenty:>>14546125 for example. We also have been using DNA evidence to track the movement of peoples throughout history using haplogroups, which are one of many ways of classifying peoples.

>>14546282
You certainly don't seem to mind benefiting from using HeLa cell line
I wouldn't go making that assumption. Using HeLa cancer cells might be having terrible consequences we're not looking into.