[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.9414997 [View]
File: 111 KB, 639x545, karl-marx-wikimedia-commons.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9414997

>>9414994
Bow down to the greatest theorist of all time, prole

>> No.8747314 [View]
File: 111 KB, 639x545, Marx.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8747314

>>8747307
I agree, but I think the heavy Marxist/Feminist/Leftist bias is quite evident, especially in Sociology textbooks. Almost everything is analysed through 'Oppressor vs Oppressed' dynamics, and theorists are almost always Leftist (e.g. Karl Marx, Judith Butler, etc). You see very little mention of Herbert Spencer, likely because his ideas of Social Darwinism aren't PC.

My main issue is Sociologists calling it a science. It's not a science. The closest the social 'sciences' come to science is the field of Economics, because it's backed by Mathematics and proofs. But it's still not sn exact science.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]