/sci/ - Science & Math

>The scientists found that, working with just two qubits, time reversal was achieved with a success rate of 85 per cent.
>When three qubits were involved more errors occurred and the experiment was successful just half the time.
It's all so tiring.

>>10266475
>Michael Griffin estimated there could've been six Saturn V launches per year every year for the same money which they blew on the shuttle program
It hurts, lads.

>>9650140
I have no idea what you're getting at.

>Using the solution from the previous exercise

>>9348237
>Every time some major breakthrough comes out it's either somebody I've heard of or somebody I haven't

>>9097363
>photo

This thread is abhorrent. I want /sci/ to leave.

>>8762363
>engineering

>>8723118

> Griffiths' 'Introduction to Electrodynamics'
> Not Wangness' 'Electromagnetic Fields'

>>7452874

>"Evolutionary psychology"

>>7452839
Let me give something.

>>7420909

>>7099887
>>You're obviously underage
>im 23
>>have such a severe superiority complex
>no i'm actually just superior
>>you're stuck in the mindset of an edgy 16 year old know-it-all
>no but i do know it all

>Every irrational number converges from Q into R
>Pi/4 = 1-1/3+1/5-...
>So:
>Pi/4 (1) = 1
>Pi/4 (2) = 1-1/3 = 2/3
>Pi/4 (3) = 1-1/3+1/5 = 7/15
>...

>e = 1+1+(1/2)!+(1/3)!
>So:
>e (1) = 1
>e (2) = 1+1 = 2
>e (3) = 1+1+1/2 = 5/2
>...

>Therefore
>Pi + e = Pi/4 (1) + e (1) = 2
>Pi + e = Pi/4 (2) + e (1) = 5/3
>Pi + e = Pi/4 (3) + e (1) = 22/15
>...
>or:
>Pi + e = Pi/4 (1) + e (2) = 3
>Pi + e = Pi/4 (2) + e (2) = 8/3
>Pi + e = Pi/4 (3) + e (2) = 37/15

>So Pi + e = Pi/4 (inf) + e (inf) = undefined

>Type "pi+e" into Wolfram Alpha
>Its 5.8598744820...

>>6818374
>vaccine
>cure

>>6795919
>>6796056
Op here again

If the digit sum of the number in base 3 is dividable by 2 then the number is dividable by 2

>>6788306
>depending on...
>and how...
>its almost..

>>6410192

>mfw my brother actually believed that every time you did addition, you lost an infinitely tiny piece of the values you were adding together

>>6189180
Why do you insist on being a prick?

>>5809759
But yeah, so I'm certain she'll be good with the actual interpretation of data and applying it to the investigation on-hand, however the one thing I am sort of worried about is that she will become cold and unemotional towards things like death and illness. I remember when she was younger hearing about a little girl dying on the news she burst into tears. Now she can see a picture of a real dead person without even blinking, it's frightening.

>Also to further clarify in my last post, just so you know, I didn't condone her going to /b/, I blocked the website and told her to save the "conditioning" for when she's older.

>>5809787
I usually am on /mu/ or /ck/, and I'm replying slowly because it's 3 am and I'm falling asleep. I think I'm gonna go to bed and check on the answers in the morning. I don't know how fast this board goes but I'm betting my thread will be up in a few hours.

>>5809839
Are you really going to judge her for acting like a normal 16 year old girl? I'm glad that's her motivation, it's very precious that she wants to help people, and sadly television shows inspire most teenagers these days contrary to actual hands on experience. But I couldn't be more proud of her.

Also I'd expect this type of response on /b/ but not on /sci/. You're too young to be posting these things on here, shouldn't you be in bed right now?

>>5683765
>macro image reply

Definition of "Image Macro":
>An image macro is a picture with superimposed text, often for humorous effect.

>>5537126
> you will either have a deficit of electrons for each aluminum atom?

>>5290346
>x perpendicular and parallel to y

>Their work is all getting outsourced to India...
no
i interviewed at a place where they tried that- and then did a complete fucking 180 when they realized that indians cant fuckin code their way out of a wet paper bag
there is a very large difference between a code monkey and a programmer.