/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7485445
>>7485342
>>7485433
>>7485471
These people are only saying they are willing to admit that science doesn't have sufficient information to make a well enough informed decision and people are arguing with them as if they know everything in the world, even though every single climate model produced has been wildly incorrect when it comes to predicting the future.
>Yes, it's very easy to make a model that is consistent with past observations and that is all that has been achieved.
I read this thread and it's the same as reading an argument about religion. We have the Global Warming(creationists) pushers claiming they know everything, then we have the absolute deniers(atheists) who claim to know for a fact that Global Warming isn't even happening, then we have the rest who say they admit that they just don't know(agnostics, see tagged posts above) yet.
The only people arguing with the agnostics are the creationists, as usual, who need their side to be true and are prone to(not always of course) have something invested in the matter. However, we all know who's is more likely to be right.

microwaves from 1mm-1m