/sci/ - Science & Math

>>4174192
Your right about the EM field. I was just making a vague simplification for the reader though. Manipulation of a "fundmental property" is perhaps better wording. The end result is correct though, manipulation of mass.

>There is no serious talk of this being able to alter mass at will.

Actually there is a lot of talk about that shit, from the people working on that shit at CERN (or the other labs). That stuff isn't discussed publically, because ya'll overreact to pretty much everything you shouldn't and underreact to the actual important shit. Basically, the public is fucking retarded. You won't officially hear the plans for "mass maniuplation" until we at least get the Higgs Boson (probably a good number of years after that).

However that is very very very far down the line right now, hence no public statements yet, and no point at getting ya'll all excited and in your public retarded stupor

>>2036339
Call him NOW!