/sci/ - Science & Math

>What would happen if an object was massive enough to exhibit gravity, but was not spherical or disc-like, akin to the natural heavenly shapes?

Say there was a huge cuboid, like a cosmic sheet of paper, massive cylinders and pyramids, or more complex shapes like post-modern "art" (Or a space highway?).
Also let's wave our wand and say these things are sturdy enough to not collapse in on themselves.
>What would the orbits of those things look like?

>>3013803
You are refering to Integration as a "procedure you use", like addition, or multiplication. That is fine. But your statement makes no fucking sense then.

>what it is you add is pure interpretation/visualization

>what it is you multiply is pure interpretation/visualization

This statement is meaningless, you can say

>what it is you ______ is pure interpretation/visualization

for any _____, and get this statement that essentailly has no meaning. You actually arent saying shit.

>>929161
>>929168
>>929200
>>929204

We are the BORG, Resistance is futile.