/sci/ - Science & Math

If we go by IQ, they are far more likely to have average intelligence than us. We, on the other hand, have more variety with stupid fucks, average fucks and bright fucks. If we only look at stupid fucks and average fucks, then women are (on average) more or less as inteligent as men.

This however doesn´t imply that women should be better than us at most things. Since we have a more significant chunk of our population gifted with midwits and bigwits, scientific contribuitions to society are far more likely to be made by men than women. In conclusion, stupid women are significantly more rare than stupid men but same goes for smart women and smart men.

Just make this a pasta and paste it whenever you're discussing women's contributions in science with a feminist or some rasinwit says women have less IQ thgan men on average. Also stop obsessing over iq, if you wan´t to show your smarts then read books and live your life for fucks sake.

>>11621455
For a visual explanation, look at the male population compared to the female population. Females tend to have mediocre IQs, while males tend to have much larger populations of extremely low IQs and extremely high IQs. Basically, on a population level over generations, the genes that give you geniuses produce spastics when they don't turn out right.

And that also brings up another problem: the relative lack of high IQ females.

So your idea for a "high IQ only" society probably wouldn't last over time.

>I hate how people shove women in STEM