[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.11471229 [View]
File: 1.12 MB, 758x1010, 65406239_p0.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11471229

>>11470919
Japanese Yokai that manipulates the boundaries between things.

>> No.9577034 [View]
File: 1.12 MB, 758x1010, 4a356642a30eb276dbb798636ae3a497.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9577034

>>9575861
>What is that?! I'd like to hear an explanation for this
>using incorrect intuition to understand something yields "spooky" results
Wow who would've thunk??
>>9576914
Integrals are pretty deep stuff as can be seen in the recent proof of the Cobordism Theorem. They can be used everywhere instead of Grothendieck-Deligne-May spectra to obtain a greater level of physical intuitions in our highly rigorous proofs, this is a meta-theorem.
>>9576936
>Well physicists are the best mathematicians anyway
Literally this.... The cobordism hypothesis can be (and has been) proved (by Mathematical Physicists), so where are the proofs of this homotopy "hypothesis"? Answer: there are none, because cobordism hypothesis is the cornerstone of something concrete (i.e. TQFT, string theory) while this homotopy hypothesis is the cornerstone of absolute algebraic wank.
And while we're at it, I would like to add that those mathematicians that dislike the supposed "lack of rigor" in physics should also reject statements proven assuming generalized RH/CH.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]