/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5732194
OP this is mass in correlation with S.R.
Does everybody still think S.R. Only has one function?
>All particles are already in the BH
>yfw

>>5545752
As to say that 'knowledge' is never something of a whole but as knowledge is ever its application and as such derived from what it posing it's use.
And as such is neither true and not justified as a standalone composure.

"Sweatshirt" =XY
ex: ... is a warm sweatshirt...
"Sweatshirt."=YX

>>5545752
As to say that 'knowledge' is never something of a whole but as knowledge is ever its applicatation and as such derived from what it posing it's use.
And as such is neither true and not justified as a standalone composure.

"Sweatshirt" =XY
ex: ... is a warm sweatshirt...
"Sweatshirt."=YX

>>5545752
As to say that 'knowledge' is never something of a whole but as knowledge is ever its applicatation and as such derived from what it posing it's use.
And as such is neither true and not justified as a standalone composure.

"Sweatshirt" =XY
ex: ... is a warm sweatshirt...
"Sweatshirt."=YX

>>5492290
Well actually, if 1=0.9999 then 3=2.999..9993 in that equation, defining itself from 3.00-00(-4) or -1

You keep thinking you can say what your saying while ignoring science

OMG MATH IS BEING CHRISTIAN!!! GUYSGUYSUGYSUGYSGUYSGUYS!!! MATH!!! ITS BEING CHRISTIAN!!!!! QUICK WE GOTTA POINT AND LAUGH!!!!

But anyway the next step would be to find the patterns in this

Any takers? We wouldn't be able to use regular methods... have to count it out ect until a pattern surfaced

You see the potential though no? Even if it hasn't been fit to standard models of learning yet

>>5471777
so.. immovable object within its diameters
>In its space its unstoppable

Unstoppable force within its relativity
>immovable but for what makes it

Ya'll see what I did thr?
When it doubt spin about