/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12306057
Is this supposed to be a response?
How do I respond when the post was a distinction without a difference? It would be like trying to reply to a sniveling cunt who retorts "no the sky isn't blue, it's light blue!". Cool story bro, say something of use next time. So do you want your mulligan or??

>Substanceless posts like yours just scream insecurity.
Well give me some substance to talk about other than a distinction without a difference, kthx.

>>12306039
>You certainly implied it when you compared a hack author to a scientist at CERN.
When did I do that? I am just going off the logic of that poster who believes that people who make and watch youtube videos are not legit. So that includes all the popsci bullshit that CERN puts out, such as dancing to a SHIVA statue like a bunch of polarized morons.

>Go watch the videos and you'll understand. You can't argue with those kinds of facts.
You think I'm arguing? What am I arguing? I'm posting facts and asking questions, silly.

>>12306060
>What is wrong with wikipedia?
Do they publish their works based on their "wikiuniversity", or is it just a bunch of jannies who work for free that confirms what's written on their website?

>>11241393
>It doesn't matter if 2 humans survives

How does one conduct research like a Chad?