/sci/ - Science & Math

>>2407158
funny?
entertaining?
You surely miss the point.
I'm in favor of making a sticky thread with all your opinions and the details about the strange world you live(and no one else) in order to get rid of your posts.
In all threads discussing social issues, you fail to realize that exceptions have no value while trying to figure out the behavior of masses.You insist with your non-mainstream opinions and how your social circle is different from any other in the world("I have no emotions, polygamy is ok and nerds get girls").
I don't know if any of these things(your opinions, your life, your friends) are true, if you're just another hipster who thinks that different=cool or if you do that just get attention.

btw, are you a mod/janitor? I think I saw one of your posts(in answer to my first) vanished.

Boosting /sci/ debates.
Lets list small expressions that summarize classical situations in in debates.
They cant be used for:
-Refer to those situations.
-Look smater
-Efficient trolling(if the other debater cant use them he will probably have to type more than you).
-Be snob
etc

Id like to invite the illustrious tripfag CNS to make some contribution.

Ill start:
Ad hominem(wiki)
An ad hominem (Latin: "to the man"), also known as argumentum ad hominem, is an attempt to link the validity of a premise to a characteristic or belief of the person advocating the premise.[1] The ad hominem is a classic logical fallacy,[2] but it is not always fallacious; in some instances, questions of personal conduct, character, motives, etc., are legitimate and relevant to the issue.[3]
Example:
"Nice ad hominem".
You can add some insult at the add to look cooler and elitist, like
"Nice ad hominem, faggot".