/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15493776
here
>>15493776
i should say the planets will continue on there APPARENT continuous couse. Of course there is no continuousness in the physical world, it is step-wise. It only seems that way because the refresh rate is so relatively fast, see pic.

>>15137113
>what they show, is that at least one of the assumptions of Bell's theorem is wrong
The assumption which was wrong was that there can be no 'spooky action at a distance', as explained in picrel here, which also explains the no signalling theorem
>>15137497
>Here, the "vital assumption" [5, p. 2] made by Bell is the absence of action at distance (i.e. as emphasized in 5, eq. 1, the independence of the outcome of an experiment performed on one particle, from the setting of the experiment performed on another particle). Therefore Bell's no-go theorem does not prevent a (classical) probabilistic interpretation of quantum mechanics using a "spooky action at distance" .
Here, the simulation theory offers a very simple explanation for the violation of the principle of locality implied by Bell's no-go theorem [5], the EPR paradox [13], Bell's inequalities violation experiments 1, 3] and quantum entanglement 22: notions of locality and distance defined within the simulation do not constrain the action space of the system performing the simulation (i.e. from the perspective of the system performing the simulation, changing the values of variables of spins/particles separated by 1 meter or 1 light year has the same complexity)

He, like most other who can't figure it out, are players immersed in a virtual reality who can understand how causality could be coming from outside of the space (pixels) and (time) cycles of their virtual world. This defeats naturalism and physicalism and these are two dogmas of soi-ence.