[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.2486140 [View]
File: 558 KB, 800x2500, M2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2486140

>> No.2075881 [View]
File: 558 KB, 800x2500, M2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2075881

herp
also, have some proof of god
-Omnipotent
>one having unlimited power or authority

Words and numbers do not exist in actuality and are mere concepts that abstract what is real from what is not. When we acknowledge something individually we do not see it for what it really is, we anticipate it. In actuality everything and anything equates 0, is undefined and wordless. We only apply linguistics to try and make better sense out of the universe, and this is called the rational belief. With this belief we declare that we have the power to make our own forged truths and build our own world through our own observance. This can be done in two ways: Empirical and Physical (Theism and Atheism); before we take steps into one of the two rational routes we should understand actuality and note the information.

Traits of God: All knowing and all loving.

Everything in actuality equates 0, is wordless and undefined, so we can literally group all into one assembly, in this case: Everything. Which also means that we can apply it’s opposite: Nothing.
Nothing and/or Space knows everything, in a literal sense; to 'know' in a literal wordless sense would be to relate to or acknowledge presence. Each and every part of us knows and acknowledges nothing for we wouldn’t be able to exist within it if they didn’t. Gravity is a rip in space, not a separate factor; it is part of nothingness and it pulls and/or loves/attracts everything. God is nothing and Gods love is Gravity.

In the beginning understand nothing exists as a simple implication, it has an idea of which is something, and it loves the idea of something! This idea is complete imagination, and an implication is knowledge. We have already defined two sets of opposites (implication/idea, knowledge/imagination) amongst other things. This is good evidence of a creator – so I’ll ask you, why is there not a religion that thought this way? (or did they in the past?)

>> No.2070129 [View]
File: 558 KB, 800x2500, M2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2070129

>> No.1980191 [View]
File: 558 KB, 800x2500, M2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1980191

As I said before. What if, by different means than your (nihilist) science the universe could be explained? And because of its 'difference' it is not accepted by your (nihilist) science. Then you're ignorant, and not accepting you've made mistakes and not attempting to correct them. If you live by the book, then you're not a scientist. True scientists have no rules, just common sense.

>> No.1943467 [View]
File: 558 KB, 800x2500, M2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1943467

>>1943460
You're quite right, you can go back to heaven, if you destroy society or remove yourself from it. Way to waste your life though right? The choice to be in heaven without a care in the world, to live in the beauty of nature, but you'd rather live in a house like an alien, and go to work, pay your bills etc.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]