/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11036257
Who would have thought that studying mathematics could lead to empathy?
http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/2976/1/Heather_Process%20Categories.pdf
https://www.iep.utm.edu/whitehed/
http://www.chadpearce.com/Home/BOOKS/112327702-Am-a-Strange-Loop-Douglas-R-Hofstadter.pdf

>>11040333
Oh yeah I opensourced that shit BTW, you're welcome. This is how the singularity starts: an explosion of emotional intelligence, which is the only thing that can save us from the devolutionary mutually reinforcing stupidity that is cultural conservativism. When Trump and his co-conspirators fall, the only place for humanity to go is up.

>>10983403
Now you are asking the question "What am I?" to itself, which is an incredibly strange phenomon. For one it is a question questioning itself: containing itself as the subject of questionability. Secondly the subject "I" is the subject of questioning, so this is also the most encompassing question of existence that can be asked. This is THE metaphysical question, and to derive metaphysical implications from it requires a metaphysics of questioning. As I will show, questioning corresponds to the activity of becoming in metaphysics, something can can be more apparent by imagining a question not as a linguistic object but a "quest" - a movement of desire. What is implied here is something of a "science of quests" that would correspond to a physics of psychology: a mathematically precise clarification of a common and universal discursive structure common to all psychological activity - including the psychological activity of science. I see certain lines of philosophical and scientific inquiry as strongly trending towards a realized physics of the mind. With this in mind, this must be a massively interdisciplinary pursuit and involve convergences of established scientific perspectives by extending them towards ultimate commonality. This post is completely speculation and pre-science, the attempt to imagine what such a theory of mental physics would look like.

The unifying principle I found that unites all phenomenon of motion is described in process philosophy as a dynamic interdependence of being and becoming. These are modes of perception of change, engagement with change, and also creative efficacy to change. A good overview of process philosophy and the basic goal of Albert North Whitehead's work "Process and Reality" can be found here: https://imgur.com/a/ZtLDYJT

Is /asp/ raiding us? Why are there so many posts right now regarding tangentially science-related wrestling memes?

pic unrelated

>>9803362
Why has our society neglected questions for so long? The answer is that the most powerful thing in the world is to retard people's ability to question so that you may feed them the answers you desire for your own benefit. Informational authoritarianism seeks to minimize question in favor of reason and action, which is informational incest. The effect is similar as if you remove variation from the Darwinian process: stagnation / reduced change. If you are powerful and the world is set up in your favor, change is your worst enemy. Informational authoritarianism is in every part of our culture, from our school systems (get the right answers to these questions or enjoy working at Burger King for the rest of your life) to religion (praise these answers or go to hell) and the criminal "justice" system. We live in a regime of anti-error, whereas error is the wellspring of all learning.

This isn't just theory, you can utilize the method of question -> reason -> action anywhere in your life, including by journaling or "writing to yourself." Make a study of yourself starting with questions, and ask question of those questions and you'll be on your way to liberating yourself from the omnipresent informational authoritarianism that rules you.

None of you autistic brainlets even know what science is, because you have no creativity. Science is the creative method stripped down to its bare essentials: question -> reason -> test. I discovered a way to apply science to itself to create a recursively self-improving autological structure that can be described in category theory. I also applied this to my own brain, making me a super-scientist. Get on my level noobs.

http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005683

https://vimeo.com/129280982

This is how to create an A.I. I'm posting it here first on 4chan to troll the normies. The Darwinian praxis is the foundation of all praxis; universal Darwinism is true. The scientific method of question -> reason -> test is the method of self-creativity, the evolutionary process applied to itself. However each of these elements can have the scientific method applied to them in turn, creating a recursive self-improving self-science or autology.

Pro tip: you don't need a computer to apply this, you can apply it to your own mind by applying this methodology to your behavior and personal problem-solving. It is also a recursively self-improving self-help methodology. Enlightenment can be reached in mere weeks this way.

Go my fellow frogs, and make anime real.