/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16057061

>>15803134
Where mmp is useful
>offering an escape hatch out of the delusions of the real number system so they can actually program computers
> recrystalizing the axiom to provide fortitude against cultural marxism
> making music sound better by revealing the limitations of the equal temperament and the overtonal beauty of limit tuning
> departing from the notion that more precison is always better by highlighting the ability to bring commensurability between magnitudes by choosing specific approxomations
> showing a greater appreciation for ancient babylonian and egyptian mathematics

>>15788625
The schematic

>>15752034
Mmp offers a more realistic insight into the nature of the continuum than the purported 'real number' system

>>15610149
>atque adeo anim numeris
anima* numeris

the nothingness and the infinite are in fact, two sides of the same coin.
The infinite nothingness is the true primitive of set theory and the polynumbers.
With nothingness, its precision is perfect, what margin of error could exist on nothingness, no matter how many 0.0... you go down you know your at 0.
With the infinite, there is no precision, how could one begin to fathom where it is in the number field, no matter how many digits you traverse, you will always get a bigger number.

This, is the root of the MMP number system, and the bridge between real and made up numbers, to clearly separate and differentiate between them. Bet on MMP if you think how numbers commensurate together has something fundementally to do with harmonics and maximizing the harmonic overtone series with ratios of harmonic commensurability

>>15044622
The point is clarity in mathematics when we say 1+1 = 2 we are not comparing apples to oranges. In code monkey terms they are all the same type.

When you dawn your mathematical garb fascinates, dazzles and blinds those to the underlying errors by [math]1 + \infty[/math] one commits a greivous error in communication! one insinuates that infinity has the same type as the unity, which is not the case. 1 can be represented in finite memory, infinity will sooner consume all the heat in the universe that show you her final digit, to cope we stick a function that resolves at iteration, but these are not the same

I offer this rosetta stone to aid in bridging these two worlds,

>>15037859
0 is perfectly precise, but it has no digits no length it really is best seen as just a place holder

Infinity has no precision at all, you can't give it a place on any number line, even if you had an endless amount of digits

We see they are two sides of the same coin, and in its attempts to consume one another creates the reality

>>15035206
seems very based anon

>>15030873
I have already created a model that helps bridge the divide between the people who pretend they have a free energy infinite calculator and those that try to build things in the real world, i call it MMP

>>15011013
zero, on the other hand, is its dual opposite. Perfect precision at no length. These 'concepts' than rest within a coherent model that clearly defines the type one is dealing with.

>>14970101
mmp embraces the paradox of the infinite nothingness by lensing it through the ideas of precision at length. Nothingness, the zero, is perfect precision at no length, while infinite is no precision at endless length. Together combined they birth the continuum, the notion of unity, magnitude and than thus number

>>14771781
well said. This is why I created the MMP number model, to help a mathematician navigate the asinine linguistics blurring the lines between the physical and metaphysical