/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7620664
The Bible is evidence for/against the existence of God, its alleged author.

If God exists, He actually wrote the Bible, or attempted to. We already know that the Bible was written by men, but since we can't disprove that they are vessels of God, that's not enough to disprove His existence.

If God exists, everything He says is the truth. That means everything in the Bible would be true. We can prove that certain things in the Bible are physically impossible. But since we can't prove that they happened anyway (remember you're dealing with the Almighty here), even THAT isn't enough to disprove the existence of God.

God isn't real because He can't be the person He says He is and still do all the things He does in the Bible. The character of God in the Old Testament is distinctly different from the character of God in the New Testament. So either God changed, or God lied. If God is a liar, I don't have to trust a single fucking word of the Bible. If God is capable of change, what use is the Bible as a tool to understand Him? I can disregard it as circular logic.

easy

>>7241313
nope. god did it

>>7238439
No trigo?

>>7237246
>no Chemical Physics

>>7188746
>grill
>on /sci/
>likes Math
>Plays enigma
>mfw