[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.12084733 [View]
File: 30 KB, 500x600, 328dd54ac0a1a575c21345f3034afab2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12084733

>>12084517
what's the under-25 rule?

>> No.11530013 [View]
File: 30 KB, 500x600, 328dd54ac0a1a575c21345f3034afab2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11530013

>>11529991
Usually my natural response would also be that the former is weird, but I happened to write a Wikipedia article a few months ago where I found doing it like this helped me making a point.
I found the former makes stating some statements more natural, because you get P(n) as conclusion, but as far as the proof praxis goes, plugging in n-1 to derive at something will usually be more awkward.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]