/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10175588
implants a/k/a Bogdabots

>>10175247
Yes. This is true.

...being signed, an inherently free from fraud. That is not the case; fraud papers do exist. If Exide gave me papers unrelated to the terms of employment we had discussed, namely 40 hours of bitch work for their private sector battery racket in exchange for a few dollars every other week, then Exide has defrauded me and their fraud paperwork is non-binding.

Consider someone who get a credit card. They call the customer service and discuss the card, and agree to some terms. Then the agent says, "Let me just email you some forms to sign," and in those forms is a clause stating that the credit card company is entitled to all future earnings of the applicant and also all assets of the applicant should be transferred to the CC company forthwith. When the applicant clicks the link to sign the email, the one the agent presented to him as having to do with the terms discussed, even though there is a fraud clause in there that says the CC company gets all assets and all future earnings into perpetuity, that is not binding and is a plain case of fraud because those terms are unrelated to verbal agreement.

Similarly, if Exide inserted some papers having to do with some governmental agency, or any agency other than a battery manufacturer, or having to do with me assigning my proxy in some matters to anyone for any reason, then all of that is non-binding fraud because it is totally unrelated to anything we discussed: 40 hours of bitch work for pay every other week at a private company. Anything other that is fraud and there is no reasonable argument to be made to the contrary. However, unreasonable arguments are often sufficient to sway the opinion of the stupid.

>>10173715
tiny numbers are merely inverse big numbers