[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.11715590 [View]
File: 50 KB, 480x673, 1588004065764.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11715590

>>11714998

>1914-1929
World War 1- Roaring Twenties

Uneducated men get sent to war, the survivors become war hero chads at home, increasingly got laid and recieve middle class jobs.

>1929-1939
Great Depression

Self explanatory, poor people have more sex since more children increases survivor of the family. Educated men who could afford college became more conservative with partner count as increase likelihood of offspring brought on extra costs.

>1939-1945
World War 2

New generation of uneducated men get sent to war, the survivors once again become war hero chads at home. Surpassing educated men in getting laid and recieve middle class jobs.

1947-1991
Cold War and Red Scare 2.0

Everyone is on edge, elites, professors and college students are seen as possibly compromised because of communism. Disinterest in them as attractive partners fall, even the elites, professors and students themselves become cautious of partners. This is compounded by lesson learned from great depression thus reducing partners and possible offspring to keep wealth stable.

>1955-1975
Vietnam War

New generation of the uneducated once more are sent to war. This time though the survivors do not become war hero chads as public opinion slowly sees them as puppets for modern imperialism. Counter culture hippie movement also decreased the attractiveness of war time heroes.


Basically world war 1&2 caused the steep increase of uneducated men become preferred partners. Afterwards the trend of uneducated men having more partners remained because college educated men loss out on peak attractiveness on three different fronts. Only Vietnam set uneducated men back and that was only briefly.

>> No.11622598 [View]
File: 50 KB, 480x673, 1588004065764.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11622598

>>11622388

Sadly it wouldn't resolve much, see Han Chinese and Indian people. Despite the Nobel prizes and heavy influx of STEM participation they still get stereotyped hard. The Chinese are still considered lying cheating bugmen and Indians are street shiters who invade/steal tech jobs for cheap. Their men are label as weak who can't properly satisfy their women. And their women are labeled as either exotic or uglies desperate to get skin lighting or facial surgery to look more European.

The truth is there will always be those from the outside who will put people down regardless of the achievements made. And the more noticeable you are the more your flaws will be called out.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]