/sci/ - Science & Math

>>4839103
>We got our asses kicked and America is the hegemony but that doesn't matter!
>yuropoor logic

There's a clear solution here, OP.

You should go to your sister, sit her down and make sweet, sweet love to her.

>go to book store

>See a book with astronomy pictures
> it's title : Billions and Billions by carl sagan

>finally understand meme

i hope this hasn't happened to you

BA philosophy: done

BSc economics: almost done

aiming for: MS STATS or ECON

>my reaction when I realized I can put my Economics degree to good use

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rR44oOYjvOw

Who knows more about electricity than the Amish?

Hey /sci/

What caused causality?

>>2318742

>#4. Statistician

I'm ok with this.

If you could go back in time and tell your undergrad self anything

?

Why is there no such thing as a conscious, intelligent, loving God?

>>2299240

physics envy video @ 24:30
>mfw "injecting randomness to make something more predictable"

that's quite bizarre

>>2287054

OP you have to define what it means to exist.

You have to show that the object "God" is beyond the category of existence.

If you can show that it is possible for God to neither exist nor not-exist, then the two positions you stated create a false dichotomy and it is possible to gave a third position and rationally suppose that God is neither an existing being nor a non-existing being. (This is not to say that he exists and doesn't exist at the same time, instead it says that such a being doesn't belong to the category of existence)

However this is extremely hard to do, existence seems to be a binary position.

Usually there are only two rational positions to hold regarding the existence of an object: either object X exists or does not.

You have to show that there is a third position, object X neither exists nor does not exist.

Good luck

>>2284202
fukn lolllleeddddddddddd

how many times will you try to explain to you friends tonight that 2010 isn't the last year in the decade, but rather the first year in the new one?

>>1948386
I dunno, I'd want to see a quack if I believed in an multidimensional superbeing that banished me from Utopia from eating from a tree because my whore ate a shroom and a snake told her to eat the apple/

>>1893089
Sand in the foreskin makes masturbation painful.

You are actively choosing not to save the 5 men. That is as real an action as choosing to flip the switch. If you never even decided what to do that would count as lack of action.