/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9853413
there's multiple comments that I co-opted the word "hypercomplex" and that I'm not using the other numbers that are called "hypercomplex." It's obvious which one is which, to any who isn't an idiot like you, because I what the properties of ^\star\mathbb{C} are.

I also co-opted the word "chirological" which already existed. In a different pronunciation it has to do with hands and feet, and again, like the other complex numbers, it is obvious that I'm not writing about hands and feet.

Why are paying attention to what I called it that its definition?

>pic related
>http://www.vixra.org/abs/1712.0598

============